LDC-E1302 — Contrary unless-then under a norm head
For LLMs5 sections
What it means
Section titled “What it means”A rule that concludes a duty or other position cannot carry a
contrary exception: unless C then not P would oppose a position that
has no complement. Only the bare proviso unless C is defined under a
norm head — it suspends the rule without deriving the opposite. The
contrary shape stops the compiler at the exception line.
The repair is to keep the bare proviso, or to move the contrary conclusion into its own rule that derives the negated atom directly. Opposition between positions travels through dedicated patterns, never through an exception conclusion.
Example
Section titled “Example”language "law.core" version "0.2";package demo.diagnostics version "0.1.0";namespace "urn:law:demo:diagnostics";
entity Tenant;relation trig(t: Tenant) kind empirical;relation done(t: Tenant) kind institutional;relation harm(t: Tenant) kind institutional;rule R defeasible { for t: Tenant; when trig(t); then duty D { bearer t; beneficiary t; achieve done(t) during [@2026-01-01, infinity); }; unless harm(t) then not done(t);}language "law.core" version "0.2";package demo.diagnostics version "0.1.0";namespace "urn:law:demo:diagnostics";
entity Tenant;relation trig(t: Tenant) kind empirical;relation done(t: Tenant) kind institutional;relation harm(t: Tenant) kind institutional;rule R defeasible { for t: Tenant; when trig(t); then duty D { bearer t; beneficiary t; achieve done(t) during [@2026-01-01, infinity); }; unless harm(t);}rule Pay defeasible { for t: Tenant; when harm(t); then done(t);}Documentation for Arxo. Writings — blog.arxo.io.
Anonymous visit counts on stats.arxo.io, no cookies.