How Arxo works
Arxo executes a pinned model against supplied facts and context. This page follows one question through the system, then maps each stage to the part of the documentation that covers it. For what Arxo is and is not, read What this is; this page is about how one answer is produced.
One question, start to finish
Section titled “One question, start to finish”The example is the one from the Quickstart: an event on 6 March 2026 starts a period of 14 calendar days — does the period end on 20 March?
The rule. The canon de.bgb.fristen carries sections 187 and 188 of the
German Civil Code as a rule (labels omitted):
@source(BGB_P187)rule TagesfristEnde(f: Frist, e: Date, d: Quantity) strict { when frist_ereignis(f, e) and frist_dauer_tage(f, d); then frist_ende(f, add_business_days(e, d));}It reads: if a period f starts with an event on date e and lasts d
days, the period ends on the date d days after e, counted under the
deadline policy the call names. @source ties the rule to the pinned text
of section 187.
Two facts and a question. Your application supplies the facts
frist_ereignis(frist, 2026-03-06) and frist_dauer_tage(frist, 14 calendar_day), the legal date and the policy BGB_FRISTEN_TAG, and asks
truth of frist_ende(frist, 2026-03-20).
The rule applies. Both premises of TagesfristEnde are among the
facts, so the rule fires. The policy does not count the event day, so the
fourteenth day is 20 March, a Friday; no weekend or holiday moves it. The
engine concludes frist_ende(frist, 2026-03-20).
What comes back. The answer document says COMPUTED (the evaluation
completed) and TRUE_ONLY (the claim is established). Its proof graph
links the conclusion to the rule TagesfristEnde and to the two facts, and
three hashes name the canon, the case and the result. Remove the duration
fact and the rule cannot fire: the answer becomes NEITHER, and whyNot
names the missing premise.
Nothing in this path reads the statute text at question time or guesses: the rule was written and checked before the question was asked, and the same inputs give the same bytes. The table below names who prepares each part and where it is documented.
Start with the role you own: author the model, call it from an application or agent, or operate the service that exposes it.
From a source to an answer
Section titled “From a source to an answer”| Stage | What you prepare or receive | Where to start |
|---|---|---|
| Source and scope | A source edition, explicit coverage and modeling decisions | Formalization Handbook |
| Executable model | Rules, vocabulary, dependencies and scenarios | Language walkthrough, Corpus engineering |
| Question and context | Facts, query kind, pinned model and time | Quickstart, SDK contracts |
| Execution | The engine evaluates the supplied model and question | Deployment overview |
| Answer | Statuses, sources, proof and hashes, including refusals or missing support | Read an answer |
| Review and reuse | Recorded checks, accepted scope and a versioned artifact | Check and release a package |
Choose an access path
Section titled “Choose an access path”- Application: use the TypeScript or Python SDK. The deadline application connects input validation, answers and saved captures.
- Terminal: use the CLI to work with packages and cases.
- Agent or editor: connect through MCP. The agent contract describes the caller’s obligations.
- Own service: deploy law serve or a private MCP endpoint.
- Model inspection: LawQL queries the structure of a model; its boundary explains when to ask the core instead.
These are access paths to documented contracts. They do not remove the need to pin versions, supply the relevant context or inspect the returned status.
Checks happen at different stages
Section titled “Checks happen at different stages”Authoring checks and scenarios examine a model. Semantic and technical reviews examine the candidate and its evidence. Application tests examine integration behavior. Deployment checks examine a running service. Agent evaluations examine the agent’s behavior over scenarios.
Read the corresponding records: Handbook reviews, application testing, deployment verification and agent evaluations. A published instruction is not proof that every platform or scenario has passed.
Keep three boundaries visible
Section titled “Keep three boundaries visible”- Handbook: prepare and review one source model.
- Corpus: organize, distribute and maintain related packages.
- Reference: look up the exact meaning of an interface, form or document.
Choose Author, Build, Agents or Operate for the next result you want to obtain.
Documentation for Arxo. Writings — blog.arxo.io.
Anonymous visit counts on stats.arxo.io, no cookies.