Presumptions and fictions: corpus forms
Breakdown of real fragments: package identifier, human act name, form rating (exemplary / debatable / wrong form choice) and why.
1. EU air passenger rights — presumption with a contrary exception (exemplary)
Section titled “1. EU air passenger rights — presumption with a contrary exception (exemplary)”Package eu.transport.air_passenger_rights (EU air passenger rights, Regulation 261/2004),
cancellation:
presumption PassengerUninformedUnlessCarrierProves(p: Passenger, f: Flight) { ... when confirmed_reservation(p, f) and cancellation(f); presume passenger_treated_as_uninformed(p, f); unless carrier_proved_notification(p, f) then not passenger_treated_as_uninformed(p, f);}Exemplary: the burden of proving notification is on the carrier (ground +
presumption + exception with priority). The contrary then not …
clause gives the rebuttal victory with a Refuted inference — unlike
the bare clause of the section’s teaching example, which gives Not established, not refuted.
The “bare vs contrary” pair in one research is deliberate.
2. German Civil Code — possessory ownership presumption (exemplary)
Section titled “2. German Civil Code — possessory ownership presumption (exemplary)”Package de.bgb.besitz_eigentum (German Civil Code, possession and ownership):
presumption VermutungDesEigentumsFuerDenBesitzer(s: Sache, p: Person) {Possession as the ground of the ownership assumption. Exemplary as a proof scheme; exception details are in the package body.
3. German Civil Code — recorded-right presumption (exemplary)
Section titled “3. German Civil Code — recorded-right presumption (exemplary)”Package de.bgb.besitz_eigentum (German Civil Code, registered rights)
— presumption VermutungDesEingetragenenRechts(r: Recht, p: Person).
A land-register entry as the ground. Same form, different ground — the
presumption scheme stable across grounds.
4. Saudi tort — causation presumption (exemplary)
Section titled “4. Saudi tort — causation presumption (exemplary)”Package sa.civil_transactions.tort_enrichment (Saudi civil transactions, tort) —
presumption DirectActorCausedDamage(a: HarmfulAct);
vicarious liability — presumption OwnerIsKeeper(p: Person, t: Thing). Presumptions as burden allocation in tort — a subject-matter
pair to the procedural EU261 form.
Legal history and custom
Section titled “Legal history and custom”5. Calendar Act 1750 — pure fiction (exemplary)
Section titled “5. Calendar Act 1750 — pure fiction (exemplary)”Package gb.corpus.calendar_act_1750 (Calendar Act 1750, Great Britain), preserved natural day:
fiction FairOrMartPreservesNaturalDay strict { ... for e: FixedEvent; when held_with_fair_or_mart(e); deem natural_day_category(e);}A fair “holds to the natural day” — equation without “if”:
strict strength mandatory and present. Exemplary.
6. Queue customary law — announced-absence presumption (exemplary)
Section titled “6. Queue customary law — announced-absence presumption (exemplary)”Package usus.corpus.ochered (queue customary law) —
presumption AnnouncedAbsenceHoldsThePlace(q: Queue, p: Person).
Announced absence holds the queue place until… — a grounded default in
customary law.
Science
Section titled “Science”7. Doctrine chemistry — presumption and fiction side by side (debatable)
Section titled “7. Doctrine chemistry — presumption and fiction side by side (debatable)”Package chem.rules (doctrine chemistry rules) —
presumption ChloridePresumedSoluble(s: Salt, c: Cation);
oxidation — fiction BondsDeemedIonic strict.
Debatable, not exemplary: the “counts as soluble” link nowhere records
whether the exception list is closed (see the negation section’s note on
debatable solubility): it is unclear whether Not established, not refuted means “soluble” or “not checked”. The ionic-bond
fiction is exemplary as a device (modelling equation).
Documentation for Arxo. Writings — blog.arxo.io.
Anonymous visit counts on stats.arxo.io, no cookies.