Markdown for LLMs
A disputed reading of a reference
The source Markdown for this article. Copy it into your assistant or download it as a text file.
# A disputed reading of a reference
## Intention
I want to split two readings of a reference across bridges and not create a self-cycle of unknownness.
Each reading of the reference gets its own bridge; neither bridge tests the unknownness of the shared head.
## Incorrect form and why it stays silent
```law title="Incorrect form"
rule ListBridge strict { for p: Person; when listed(p) and not_known(admitted(p)); then admitted(p); }
```
The conclusion depends on its own absence: a negative cycle, LDC-E4102. A dispute about where to take the ground from is expressed by two bridges, not by checking unknownness of their shared head.
## Correct form
Minimal standalone form:
```law
language "law.core" version "0.2";
package recipes.z.r06 version "0.1.0";
namespace "urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06";
source Standard { kind standard; jurisdiction "none"; }
edition Edition of Standard { language ru; officiality official; in_force [@2026-01-01, infinity); }
fragment Clause in Edition { kind paragraph; locator "1"; text ru official "Учебная норма допускает два прочтения."; }
entity Person;
relation listed(p: Person);
relation licensed(p: Person);
relation admitted(p: Person);
rule ListBridge strict { for p: Person; when listed(p); then admitted(p); }
rule LicenceBridge strict { for p: Person; when licensed(p); then admitted(p); }
interpretation ListReading of Clause { status disputed; include ListBridge; }
interpretation LicenceReading of Clause { status disputed; include LicenceBridge; }
interpretation_group Reference { alternatives ListReading, LicenceReading; selection exactly_one; }
```
## Frozen execution scene
| Facts and choice | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1. only a record, no choice | `admitted` | `NEITHER` / `INTERPRETATION_REQUIRED` |
| 2. a record present, list bridge chosen | `admitted` | `TRUE_ONLY` / `COMPUTED` |
| 3. same facts, licence bridge chosen | `admitted` | `NEITHER` / `COMPUTED` |
```law
test "record only, no choice" {
given {
context {
legal_time @2026-09-13;
decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
timezone "Asia/Almaty";
}
assert listed(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p"));
}
evaluate truth(admitted(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p")));
expect truth_status == NEITHER;
expect evaluation_status == INTERPRETATION_REQUIRED;
}
```
```law
test "record with list bridge chosen" {
given {
context {
legal_time @2026-09-13;
decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
timezone "Asia/Almaty";
interpretation ListReading;
}
assert listed(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p"));
}
evaluate truth(admitted(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p")));
expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;
expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;
}
```
```law
test "same facts, licence bridge chosen" {
given {
context {
legal_time @2026-09-13;
decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00+05:00;
timezone "Asia/Almaty";
interpretation LicenceReading;
}
assert listed(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p"));
}
evaluate truth(admitted(entity_ref("urn:recipe:z-interpretations:06:p")));
expect truth_status == NEITHER;
expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;
}
```
## Counterfactual
Sidecar mutation: `when listed(p);` → `when listed(p) and not_known(admitted(p));`; expected `LDC-E4102`. Additional scenes with fragment deletion are marked in the table; the outcome is checked by both evaluators.
## Boundary
Crossing a bridge does not automatically carry the terms or the competence of another norm.
## Pitfall
Testing the unknownness of one's own head is a negative cycle, rejected with LDC-E4102.