# Take an application through stages ## Intent I want to distinguish a filed application from completed consideration. ## Wrong form and why it stays silent ```law title="Incorrect form" procedure Other(app: Application) { state Draft initial; } ``` A state, transition, or region name is unique in the whole package. Another procedure’s name does not create a separate resolution scope for a bare Draft. ## Correct form ```law language "law.core" version "0.2"; package recipes.k.r01 version "0.1.0"; namespace "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01"; entity Application; event Tick { } procedure Filing(app: Application) { state Draft initial; state Submitted; state Done terminal; transition Submit { from Draft; to Submitted; on Tick; } transition Decide { from Submitted; to Done; on Tick; } } ``` ## Frozen execution scene P and Q in the table are different instances; E1/E2/E3 are carriers with an explicitly given time. All identifiers and instants are pinned in the scenes. | Events and facts | Question | Answer | |---|---|---| | instance with no attempts | `truth(current_state(P,Draft))` | `truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;` / `COMPUTED` | | only filed | `truth(current_state(P,Submitted))` | `truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;` / `COMPUTED` | | full chain | `truth(current_state(P,Done))` | `truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;` / `COMPUTED` | | decision without filing | `truth(current_state(P,Done))` | `truth_status == NEITHER;` / `COMPUTED` | | draft already left | `truth(current_state(P,Draft))` | `truth_status == NEITHER;` / `COMPUTED` | ```law test "initial state holds without attempts" { given { context { legal_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; timezone "UTC"; } assert procedure_instance(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p")); } evaluate truth(current_state(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"),Draft)); expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY; expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED; } ``` ```law test "submitted state after filing" { given { context { legal_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; timezone "UTC"; } assert procedure_instance(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p")); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Submit, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E1", time: @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z }); } evaluate truth(current_state(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"),Submitted)); expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY; expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED; } ``` ```law test "full chain reaches done" { given { context { legal_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; timezone "UTC"; } assert procedure_instance(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p")); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Submit, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E1", time: @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z }); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Decide, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E2", time: @2026-09-03T09:00:00Z }); } evaluate truth(current_state(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"),Done)); expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY; expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED; } ``` ```law test "decision without submission stays neither" { given { context { legal_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; timezone "UTC"; } assert procedure_instance(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p")); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Decide, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E1", time: @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z }); } evaluate truth(current_state(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"),Done)); expect truth_status == NEITHER; expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED; } ``` ```law test "abandoned draft no longer holds" { given { context { legal_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z; timezone "UTC"; } assert procedure_instance(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p")); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Submit, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E1", time: @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z }); assert attempted_transition(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"), Decide, Tick { id: "urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:E2", time: @2026-09-03T09:00:00Z }); } evaluate truth(current_state(entity_ref("urn:recipe:k-procedures:01:p"),Draft)); expect truth_status == NEITHER; expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED; } ``` ## Counterfactual Mutation check — LDC-E1351. Original fragment: ```text state Submitted; ``` Replacement: ```text state Submitted; state Draft; ``` Scenes with a condition removed are marked separately; the same inputs get a different outcome. ## Boundary A duplicate name is rejected statically with E1351. An empty history has initial_state, but not entered_state with a fictional carrier. One legal_time date selects the law for the whole presented history; temporal frames by editions are a separate instrument.