# Keep contradictory documents

## Intent

I want to see both accepted supports when documents diverge.

The example rules are teaching material, not norms of a force-of-law act.

## Wrong form and why it stays silent

```text title="Incorrect form"
// supports и refutes взаимно уничтожаются, значит NEITHER.
```

Opposite accepted supports yield BOTH. The unit of acceptance is an edge, not a fact and not a document; a rejected edge does not create opposite support.

## Correct form

```law
language "law.core" version "0.2";
package recipes.d.r06 version "0.1.0";
namespace "urn:recipe:d-evidence:06";

entity Person;
entity Record;
relation finding(p: Person) kind empirical;
relation eligible(p: Person) kind institutional;
relation edge(e: Text, d: Text, link: Text);
relation evidence_status(d: Text, state: Text);
relation authentic(d: Text, verifier: Text, outcome: Text);
relation available(d: Text);
relation current(d: Text);
relation accepted(e: Text);
rule Accept strict {
    for e: Text; for d: Text; for link: Text;
    when edge(e,d,link) and evidence_status(d,"verified")
      and authentic(d,"urn:recipe:verifier","verified") and available(d) and current(d);
    then accepted(e);
}
evidence policy Documents {
    profile "law.core.evidence-policy/0.1";
    accepts accepted; protects finding;
    input edge edge; input status evidence_status; input authentic authentic;
    input available available; input current current;
    rule Accept;
}
rule Use strict { for p: Person; when finding(p); then eligible(p); }
```

## Frozen execution scene

In the table P and Q are different entities of the page, C is a case; full identifiers are pinned in the scenes.

| Input on 13.09.2026 (a different date is named in the scene) | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| positive support | `truth(finding(P))` | `TRUE_ONLY` / `COMPUTED` |
| negative support | `truth(finding(P))` | `FALSE_ONLY` / `COMPUTED` |
| two documents | `truth(finding(P))` | `BOTH` / `COMPUTED` |
| one document not accepted | `truth(finding(P))` | `TRUE_ONLY` / `COMPUTED` |
| contested premise not established | `truth(eligible(P))` | `NEITHER` / `COMPUTED` |

```law
test "supporting edge establishes finding" {
    given {
        context {
            legal_time @2026-09-13;
            decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            timezone "UTC";
            evidence_policy Documents;
        }
        evidence Doc: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Doc supports finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VDoc { evidence Doc; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}
    }
    evaluate truth(finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p")));
    expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;
    expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;

}
```

```law
test "refuting edge defeats finding" {
    given {
        context {
            legal_time @2026-09-13;
            decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            timezone "UTC";
            evidence_policy Documents;
        }
        evidence Doc: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Doc refutes finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VDoc { evidence Doc; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}
    }
    evaluate truth(finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p")));
    expect truth_status == FALSE_ONLY;
    expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;

}
```

```law
test "two documents support and refute" {
    given {
        context {
            legal_time @2026-09-13;
            decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            timezone "UTC";
            evidence_policy Documents;
        }
        evidence Doc: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Doc supports finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VDoc { evidence Doc; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}evidence Other: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Other refutes finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VOther { evidence Other; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}
    }
    evaluate truth(finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p")));
    expect truth_status == BOTH;
    expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;

}
```

```law
test "unaccepted edge changes nothing" {
    given {
        context {
            legal_time @2026-09-13;
            decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            timezone "UTC";
            evidence_policy Documents;
        }
        evidence Doc: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Doc supports finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VDoc { evidence Doc; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}evidence Other: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Other refutes finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
    }
    evaluate truth(finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p")));
    expect truth_status == TRUE_ONLY;
    expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;

}
```

```law
test "disputed premise stays unestablished" {
    given {
        context {
            legal_time @2026-09-13;
            decision_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            knowledge_time @2026-09-13T09:00:00Z;
            timezone "UTC";
            evidence_policy Documents;
        }
        evidence Doc: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Doc supports finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VDoc { evidence Doc; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}evidence Other: Record {
    status verified; observed_at @2026-09-01T08:00:00Z;
    recorded_at @2026-09-01T09:00:00Z;
    valid [@2026-09-01, @2026-10-01);
    content_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
}
support Other refutes finding(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p"));
verification VOther { evidence Other; document_hash "sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
    verifier "urn:recipe:verifier"; outcome verified; recorded @2026-09-02T09:00:00Z;
}
    }
    evaluate truth(eligible(entity_ref("urn:recipe:d-evidence:06:p")));
    expect truth_status == NEITHER;
    expect evaluation_status == COMPUTED;

}
```

```python
>>> import runpy
>>> check = runpy.run_path("docs/recipes/d-evidence/resources/check.py")
>>> check["check_acceptance"](https://github.com/arxohq/law/blob/master/docs/recipes/d-evidence/6)
'Д6: принятие, отчёт и proof проверены; lawc = lawref'
```

## Counterfactual

Diagnostic mutation (check) — LDC-E4703.

Original fragment:

```text
then eligible(p);
```

Replacement:

```text
then finding(p);
```

The paired scenes above pin the change of outcome.

## Boundary

BOTH does not mean proven falsehood and is not replaced by NEITHER. The normative rule Use reads establishment; choice of conflict policy is the context’s responsibility. Provenance of acceptance is checked separately from truthStatus.

## Pitfall

Opposite accepted supports yield BOTH rather than cancelling out: the unit of acceptance is an edge, not a fact and not a document.