# Judgment channel: pitfalls Wrong forms, silent outcomes, diagnostics, typical formalizer and AI-agent mistakes, and how to detect them. "Confirmed by running" items were reproduced in this study on installed `law` (semantics `law.core/0.2`). ## 1. A silent judge as `FALSE_ONLY` "The court stayed silent — so the condition is unmet" — no: before an adjudicated assertion the result is `NEITHER` with `REQUIRES_JUDGMENT`. Silence never reads as `ACTIVE` nor as achievement. In a composite condition every judge-leaf gets the query with a `NEITHER` pair while the whole condition is `NEITHER`; once the other leaves decide, there is no query. Detection: `expect evaluation_status == REQUIRES_JUDGMENT`, not only `truth_status`. ## 2. An answer of the wrong origin (confirmed by running) Only `origin adjudicated` closes the channel. A court answer filed as `case_input` is ordinary support: if the head is a judgment relation, it closes anyway (a fact is a fact), but the organ and form (`judgment`) checks never run; another's evaluation filed as `adjudicated` passes for the organ's answer (an answer without `judgment` is an assertion of the relation). Detection: name the origin literally in tests; in doubtful places demand a `judgment` object with organ and form. ## 3. A dead rule awaiting a judge A query comes only from a live rule: a refuted neighbour, a false comparison, `false`, a support found under `not_known`, a diverging status test make the rule dead — the answer is `NEITHER`/`COMPUTED` with empty `judgmentRequests`. The exception is a `refuted` test over the judgment relation itself at `NEITHER`: "is it refuted" undecided yet, the judge decides, the rule is live. Detection: a control pair of scenarios (dead rule silent / live rule asking). ## 4. A question without `kind` A question literal is the same `Literal` as in CLIR, with mandatory `kind: "literal"`. An off-schema question is rejected before computation (`QUERY_INVALID`), never answered in another sense. Historically the same question without `kind` gave `COMPUTED` where with `kind` it is `REQUIRES_JUDGMENT`, with no single diagnostic. Detection: the question schema. ## 5. An invented threshold instead of an organ "'Excessive = over N' as a number in a rule" substitutes counting for the channel. If the criterion is genuinely countable (42 hours of rest), this is not judgment but a fact with a threshold from the text; if evaluative ("plainly excessive") — a judgment relation, and inventing a number is forbidden. The reverse mistake: the countable given to the judge — eternal waiting for an unneeded answer. Detection: the three-way fork (judgment / court fact / reading) — in a comment on every evaluative feature, as in the Turkish constitution. ## 6. A typo in `authority` A declaration's `authority` is the institution's StableId, not a term: needs no declaration, checked by equality. A typo (`Cort` for `Court`) gives no diagnostics — the real organ's answer is simply never accepted (`JUDGMENT_AUTHORITY_MISMATCH` on an answer with `judgment`, silence on an answer without it), and the case hangs in `REQUIRES_JUDGMENT` forever. Detection: grep `authority` across the package and reconcile with the answer's organ. ## 7. A judge through defeat and immunity correctly silent A defeasible rule whose defeater already gave an application with no priority over it gives no query: no adjudicated assertion revives it. A power whose effect is locked by an applicable undefeated immunity is not live: no query from `valid_when`, the answer is `NEITHER`/`COMPUTED`. This is not a channel defect but liveness: the judge's answer changes nothing. Detection: read the defeat/immunity outcome before the query path. ## 8. AI-agent trap: writing the answer for the judge "'The court will presumably find the measure proportionate'" is forbidden: a presumption is a fact without support, and support without origin. A test with an invented `adjudicated` passes but proves the test author's imagination, not law. Close the channel in examples only with a marked synthetic answer (`origin adjudicated` in a teaching case), in the corpus only with a real one. ## 9. Words after "bearer" — lowercase only Write `bearer`/`holder` only as lowercase keywords. ## 10. Judgment channel without `authority` — `LDC-E0201` A body without an organ never names who decides — a static `LDC-E0201` refusal ("judge without an organ"; the mutation cutting `authority Court;` expects exactly this code). Not to confuse with item 6: a typo in the organ stays silent until execution, while a missing organ already fails `check`. Detection: the same mutation — cut `authority` from a copy of the example and expect `LDC-E0201`.