# Scope card: employee accident insurance, four-article slice

Package kz.corpus.employee_accident_insurance, version 0.1.0, language 0.2, zero dependencies, explicit local imports.

## Question

What does an employer owe, and what does a worker receive, under four articles of the employer accident-insurance act? Asked by case handlers preparing employer duty, premium, payout, and penalty answers.

## Case categories

- Employers, varying by professional risk class (one through twenty-two) and annual payroll.
- Workers, varying by capacity-loss percent and by overdue payment with days delayed.

## Applicability

Employers and workers under the Kazakh employer accident-insurance act, for cases dated within the pinned edition. Answers apply to the duty, premium, payout, and penalty questions only; eligibility edges are the tariff table bounds and the payout interval (see Limits).

## In scope

- Article 8, employer duty to insure: the duty rule establishes the duty for each employer with employees.
- Article 17, tariff classes with premium: twenty-two strict tariff rules plus the premium rule, premium as payroll times rate.
- Article 19, payout eligibility: the payout rule for capacity loss from thirty through one hundred percent.
- Article 9, late-payment penalty: the penalty rule, unpaid times 0.015 times days.

## Out of scope

- Articles 1 through 7, 10 through 16, 18, and 20 through 28: outside the four-article slice. Each stays out because no case category in this package asks its question; revisit on scope widening.

## Limits

- Tariff classes one through twenty-two only; no class outside the table is answered.
- Payout only for loss from thirty through one hundred percent (see EAI-D2).
- Penalty exact with no rounding step (see EAI-D3).

## Inputs

Per case, the package requires: the employment relation (who employs whom); the risk-class assignment per employer; the payroll figure per employer; the loss percent per worker; the overdue amount with days delayed per worker. No answer derives without its inputs; missing inputs leave the question undecided, not denied.

## Dependencies

none — the manifest declares zero dependencies, and the lock file carries empty dependency edges with an empty package list. Local imports inside the package are explicit.

## External data

All case input, never derived by the package; supplier is the case file (same items as Inputs above). External computations: none — every amount in the answers is computed by package rules from case facts.

## Human decisions

none — the package declares no open readings and no judgment calls. Confirmed by searching the package sources for interpretation, judgment, and closure policies (no matches) and by reading every suite origin (all case input).

## Provenance

Edition EAI_EDITION, label PINNED_UNOFFICIAL_COPY — an Adilet API copy retrieved 2026-09-13, sha256 pinned, local copy kept in the package.

## Readiness

Review may start when: the pinning check exits silent zero; the static check reports OK; the suite reports seven of seven on tool `law` 0.1.0 (binary hash sha256:78dea06ce928547e87bd9875a2556cc663def37cbb78c8b04aa0da57839c95d7); this card, the source inventory, and decision records EAI-D1 through EAI-D3 are complete; open findings are listed on the review record (EAI-R1 open).